This is my blog where you can get details on how to get a commission as well as status updates! You can also keep track of my image posts on callmepo.tumblr.com (general audience) and pinupsushi.tumblr.com (mature works here!)
Monday, October 13, 2008
Two more images deleted from DA
Wedgies are considered sexual now on DA... so all those schoolyard bullies are not torturing kids but sexually harassing them?
I'm really concerned that they're being this retarded. I've been noticing witch hunts being conducted on any pictures of Raven or Starfire that are remotely capable of giving someone a boner. My only guess is that it's a lolicon thing, but Raven is hardly a loli character. She's a late teen, for crying out loud.
DA, where the encourage Creativity, devirsity, community, and if you even step one toe out of line!? YOU are scum!.... gotta love DA.. oh wait, no ya don't.
Oh yes, it's a lolicon thing for Deviant Art. As long as the character is primarily a minor, which can be under 21 in some countries, then they have a problem with depicting the character in a sexual way.
In this case they're using a very literal reading of the definition of child pornography in which it only requires that the depiction of a minor feature the exposed buttocks to be considered kiddie porn. This reading makes the little Coppertone girl an expression of kiddie porn.
All that aside, I'm glad Callmepo found his way to the blogspot so he can still post his work when DA puts on the blinders and start deleting things.
And it might just be me, but Raven doesn't look that young in this pic. To me, she looks 18 or 19.
Compare this to the pedo-tastic material you see strewn throughout Turuchan's gallery, and you'll see my point.
And note that Teru, to the best of my knowledge, hardly ever has stuff taken down. I guess when you don't use pop characters, you can get away with all the loli shit you want on DA.
What I find even more weird is the fact that they allow all these nude photographs and not the nude drawings. I mean a lot of those photos are more daring then the drawings, there's full view of all organs and not rarely sexual agenda. There's even a bunch that has fetish as specialisation. But nooo, a little daring drawing could never be art... I'm confused...
9 comments:
I expect dA would tell you there is too much skin showing. I'm glad I get to these before the trolls/mods do.
Minus that there is a little more when the bottoms are being pulled up.. its the exact amount of skin that shows normaly on them :P
I'm really concerned that they're being this retarded. I've been noticing witch hunts being conducted on any pictures of Raven or Starfire that are remotely capable of giving someone a boner. My only guess is that it's a lolicon thing, but Raven is hardly a loli character. She's a late teen, for crying out loud.
DA, where the encourage Creativity, devirsity, community, and if you even step one toe out of line!?
YOU are scum!.... gotta love DA.. oh wait, no ya don't.
Oh yes, it's a lolicon thing for Deviant Art. As long as the character is primarily a minor, which can be under 21 in some countries, then they have a problem with depicting the character in a sexual way.
In this case they're using a very literal reading of the definition of child pornography in which it only requires that the depiction of a minor feature the exposed buttocks to be considered kiddie porn. This reading makes the little Coppertone girl an expression of kiddie porn.
All that aside, I'm glad Callmepo found his way to the blogspot so he can still post his work when DA puts on the blinders and start deleting things.
And it might just be me, but Raven doesn't look that young in this pic. To me, she looks 18 or 19.
Compare this to the pedo-tastic material you see strewn throughout Turuchan's gallery, and you'll see my point.
And note that Teru, to the best of my knowledge, hardly ever has stuff taken down. I guess when you don't use pop characters, you can get away with all the loli shit you want on DA.
What I find even more weird is the fact that they allow all these nude photographs and not the nude drawings. I mean a lot of those photos are more daring then the drawings, there's full view of all organs and not rarely sexual agenda. There's even a bunch that has fetish as specialisation.
But nooo, a little daring drawing could never be art... I'm confused...
I love these two, and this piece. Awesome job, CMP!! :)
Da going to lose a lot of users for bing stupid.
Post a Comment